?? Work at Pickup Points � Flexible schedule

PL / DMPL Morgan Dollars - Comparing u0026 Discussing the PL u0026 DMPL Designation - PCGS / NGC

TheCoinGeek 8 views

Download Video

Comments

So will dmpls still have full cartwheel luster? These appear to have them Recently got a 1878 claimed to be dmpl, but having my doubts and don't see a luster just mirrored fields doesn't appear to be cleaned or polished, but now I'm unsure after seeing these
Comment from : @asc-dq7lx

I won’t waste my money on grading anymore They cheat
Comment from : @prawnstar9213

wait, aren't both of those DPL's cleaned? Look at the reverse at Eagle just beneath his tail feathers and you'll see some "north-south" parallel hairlines pass "underneath" him in the fields I have several of these especially in 80-S that are like this, but others (see 84-O's and even some other 80-S) tend to not have these Are they added "special effects" from the Mint or light cleaning that graded companies excuse(d) due to only affecting underneath the reverse devices instead of the luster on them?
Comment from : @Pdstor

Beautiful coins with wonderful art in amazing condition
Comment from : @michaelm7843

I've seen some Morgan's that are definitely PL on one side and business strike finish on the other and always wondered if something fishy was goin on
Comment from : @shibbidydoowop

Good topic for me to study Thanks for showing the DMPL
Comment from : @everettwhite9874

Great information Thank you!
Comment from : @frankchase9297

TYTY sir - exacccccccctly what I wanted to see! I totally agree that the marks are much harder NOT to see and actually the more you look at them the more they ARE THERE in your face! :) TY for this video!brbrPS - Do you have a preference between PCGS/NGC for 1 these type of coins specificallybr 2 In general as well?
Comment from : @andrewhart6200

As Maxwell Smart would say, "the old 'Read The Lettering In The Mirror' trick"! I'll add that to the bag of tricks
Comment from : @davidufford1328

Dip them in E-zest 😉
Comment from : @SeanJohnson-qm4pu

Informative study on the subject Geek Thanks
Comment from : @joeramirez709

Please post your videos on Rumble too Thanks!!!!!
Comment from : @KKustenmacher

I've always been told that DMPLs in old holders were a lot more lenient than in modern holders No surprises in this video
Comment from : @example100000

Thanks Ben, very interesting video I like the idea of split grading
Comment from : @coinstruck6079

So if you get a coin “reholdered” you can get a crappy dmpl in a modern holder with the same grade ? I’m assuming the answer is yes, so even in a new holder you can have a “gradeflation” dmpl
Comment from : @tylonnplatinumthe3rd659

Very nice Morgans Love to see the comparisons Clarity of the writing in the reflection is a neat little trick
Comment from : @don951

Surprised about some of those - especially the 82 CC; from what I see in the video it doesn't even look prooflike All very nice coins, nonetheless
Comment from : @MichaelC_22

man, that '84-O is stunning!
Comment from : @txalex

Yeah it’s weird how the numerical grade has become more lenient but the designations for coins have been graded for conservatively over the years
Comment from : @stephennalepa9531

I’m on my way to the shop in about an hour I ventured to Tucson today
Comment from : @borderlandstacker6127

Ohhthe DMPL
Comment from : @TampaCoinGuy

Same thing has happened with the Red and Red/Brown designations over the years There are a lot of ugly coins in old pcgs and ngc Red labeled holders That’d make a great video Ben
Comment from : @tylonnplatinumthe3rd659

Thank you Ben for sharing information and some really Good looking Morgan Dollars which are my all time favorite Silver Dollars You have some really Good examples for what you are Teaching
Comment from : @MikeSmith-yo9ch

Sweet God!!! I would love to own some coins like that jeeeeeezzzuuuuuusss!
Comment from : @wisconsincrhunter5614

To be honest, I dint know why any of those coins got 64 grade I have seen 63s with less marks Sorry
Comment from : @paulbegansky5650

The preparation process for the dies changed I believe in 1891 so that cameo appears very infrequently in later date Morgans like in the 1897
Comment from : @defiantsisko