?? Work at Pickup Points � Flexible schedule

The $130B Plan to Replace the U.S.’s Nuclear Missiles | WSJ Equipped

The Wall Street Journal 1 views

Download Video

Comments

Keep it like it is, maintained and operating It's fine
Comment from : @Johnny53kgb-nsa

They've wasting 180b of people's money without asking on nuke boomers, do the people want that? Did they ask them? show them? Etc Don't think so So gangs and homeless are not allowed but wasting money on nukes and booms is allowed 🤔 gee think again 😢 Just wait the future generator mite not be
Comment from : @zanitalh7486

Shouldn’t they have silos in Alaska and Hawaii as well?
Comment from : @MaheshWalatara

Out law ! Nuclear weapons
Comment from : @Mike-j7o

Obsolete, waste of $x$x$
Comment from : @user-lh5hm7kb3y

What a coincidence, my wife calls me minuteman
Comment from : @53af00d

The US gov't has a nuclear offense strategy and not defense It has a poisonous imperialistic policy
Comment from : @RawTruthRT

Debt financing provided by China, etcbrThe US couldn't go shopping like this without its credit cardbrbrQ: What would the US look like without its massive debt?brA: Poor
Comment from : @alyu1129

Thousands of warheads that can destroy the world, but the government is trying to tell me that my 2A is a threat to public safety LOL
Comment from : @LeaveMyFreedomBe

Fun fact the largest nuclear weapon by yield in our arsenal can be fitted to an F-16’s wing 😂
Comment from : @XibeastmasteriX

Jesus they have the money you throw away most of it anyway just do it look at the times we are living in
Comment from : @unknOwN-nv9nu

Those missile bodies are not made out of steel lady do your homework
Comment from : @busterbeagle2167

I'm sorry, but your speech patterns are hideous to listen to in this context
Comment from : @busterbeagle2167

There is no other way !!!!!breven if it will cost >200b is must be done !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Comment from : @hafangneige322

0:51 F-117s don't drop large nuclear payloads There's supposed to be a picture of a B2 or B21
Comment from : @denverbax6329

HEY ELONcan't believe you think this bloat is just fine but you gotta *k the working American by pushing to destroy social security and Medicare
Comment from : @jaysonpida5379

they do not have the money due to privatisation all the money goes in their pocket not the nation America might be a superpower but greedy men will bring your nation to the ground national debt means no money
Comment from : @gasman11

Simplestop giving to to ukraine and upgrading will be no problem
Comment from : @dystopia4947

Cost overruns are omnipresent now They built a hydroelectric project in my province It was supposed to cost $12 billion It wound up costing close to $20 billion It still doesn’t work as it should Worst of all, a province whose total population is 525000 has decided the consumers in the province, some 160000, are expected to pay off the project Madness
Comment from : @johnearle7776

Nuclear weapon solos are stationary targets and sitting ducks brWhy doesn’t the US develop MOBILE LAUNCHED NUKES because they are nearly impossible to find and track??????
Comment from : @hopcat500

Asteroid: Am I joke to you?
Comment from : @Teacher2Polis2XtraRice

Russia no longer has bigger USA always bigger better stronger
Comment from : @Leslie-o5c

Minuteman 3
Comment from : @kurtjammer9568

Let’s balance our budget first We have enough Nukes for now Not worth going into more debt
Comment from : @greghight954

DOGE shall cut cost, find new contractor, ask SpaceX to bid
Comment from : @qima9926

Apakabar as dan nato wkwkwkwk Lihat tu irbm konvensional rusia ke ukraina Plonga plongo, goblokbrbrBravo, uraaaaa rusia
Comment from : @RioSaragihGaringging

This is dumb because China has secrete missile launch facilities from space
Comment from : @Mumbo_Jumbo_Kiwi1

Whoever is against this truly doesn't understand why we're the World's most Reliable Superpower today brAs we've been seeing in Russia's Invasion of Ukraine the importance of having Reliable War Equipment so our troops are receiving WWII munitions or worse receiving wood blocks packaged as grenades brKeeping our nuclear weapon systems reliable and upgraded for today's world is cheap compared to if we didn't and the worse happens brThose who are saying $130 or even $150 Billion (always overspending due to unexpected costs) is too much to spend for your safety will be the first ones asking how could our Military allow this to happenbrInstead of ignoring the fact that WWIII has already started you (Congress) need to give our Military what it needs to keep us safe and ensure wars don't touch our soil and if it does we will be ready with everything we need to defend ourselves
Comment from : @infamoustimes2927

And we spent billions on other countries and we can’t spend billions to upgrade our defense system that’s wild
Comment from : @bostonrican617

An unfortunate necessity
Comment from : @gregc247

Now we gonna have Elon and DOGE to fix this mess He knows about rockets and efficiency!
Comment from : @NexVice

The problem with Sentinel is it will be too old by the time it enters service Hopefully, Boeing wasn't in charge of the software
Comment from : @adolfogomez7463

Only 37 over budget Who would have known
Comment from : @adolfogomez7463

Something is missing on that calulation: Russia's antimissile capabilities (which we do not have)
Comment from : @adolfogomez7463

The cold war never really ended, did it?
Comment from : @keeganplayz1875

Sarmat-2 are way ahead Good luck catching up
Comment from : @realomon

Just think of what the US could do with an extra $$150 BILLION $$ brAnd no they will not make the US safer Alliances and negotiations with the UN and NATO will make any country far more safer than spending BILLIONS on nuclear weapons that nobody will ever use
Comment from : @andyjohnson3790

Monyth 60th
Comment from : @QocaryanKesoyan

You know icbm can be easily intercepted by a particle weapons or gauss weapons
Comment from : @Tribipentium325

Spending 130b on something that is “supposed” to never be used seems very wise
Comment from : @kzh5443

$130B is a deal compared to money spent during the brandon administration
Comment from : @RedRoseModels

& can that WARHEAD can be SELF-DISTRUCT in SKY to ABORT THE OPS
Comment from : @wuffbuff

Teachers are like, hmm can we get some new books for the school? Nah, we don't have the budget Can we make some new nukes? Oh yeah, what do you need, a few hundred billion dollars? No prob!
Comment from : @2fast2nick

$130 billion is absolutely horrendous value 😂
Comment from : @Ianmundo

Elon, help! ☎️ 🚀 🇺🇸
Comment from : @moneyballX

Meanwhile the US is 35 trillion in national debt
Comment from : @SageFrogOil

Get it done now Russia is way ahead of the US as far as nuclear modernization is concerned The US has put this off for too long Most of the current US Minuteman missiles would probably disintegrate on the way to their target and not cause any damage
Comment from : @WormsHere

Insane 😅😅and there are people who don't know if the have enough food tomorrow
Comment from : @wiley2968

Lets be honest, these aren't THAT important What is important are the nuclear submarines with multiple warheads on 1 missile that can reach a target almost instantly hanging out on a targets coast Thats the real nuclear deterrent I'd prefer we'd just cut this budget and invest into those submarines at like a 50 cut
Comment from : @ryanmeier8994

You are doomed
Comment from : @NeoYas

0:52 A russian submarine and a non-nuclear capable bomber
Comment from : @daisaigaming6836

What ever you dodon't look up the Sentinel spaced based AI surveillance system It's highly classified
Comment from : @MattLong90

The aliens neutralized all the nukes surprise surprise
Comment from : @rogerrolex6981

I guess Boeing is making these missiles, huh?
Comment from : @sparerib5494

We sent 100 billion to Ukraine in two consecutive years That alone could have rebuilt our entire nuclear arsenal
Comment from : @TheRawdawg

You can dig up the cable and splice into it to launch the missle That doesn't sound very safe lol
Comment from : @JustinTurnerman

60 year old missiles? Im sure they still work fine My 60 year tv still works fine😂
Comment from : @youarebeingtrolled6954

Of course the projected cost for the Sentinal program wasn't enough Happens every time we build a new weapons system in this country I think the whole Sentinal program is a bad IDEA! We don't need more nuclear weapons we don't need to spend all that money on more nuclear weapons we have over 6,000 warheads it's just a bad idea Personally I think it really stinks Take that money and feed people clothe people and give them some shelter
Comment from : @johndyson4109

Seems cheap
Comment from : @andrewsmith4492

Perez Betty Martinez Helen Hall Matthew
Comment from : @HarringtonBartholomew-u9d

Martin Sarah Allen Melissa Jones Michael
Comment from : @DickeyHorace

que sea muy bonito y simple algo de los 70s el usar diskette de 5 1/2 wooow no saben admitir que eso ya no sirve
Comment from : @HunterX78

Young Edward Robinson Angela Lee Scott
Comment from : @LeightonEdwina-k5f

Guess this really means "cold war" round twocongratulations Putin
Comment from : @walcoman

there's no point in doing this Sending icbms means the end of the world Focus 100 on defending against icbms They are only 50 effective if even that
Comment from : @dhLord64

Well, perhaps if we had not spent all that money arming Ukraine
Comment from : @davidingleby6115

super
Comment from : @aneeshktm1393

Smola9000000000000segf
Comment from : @YuriyFITSAK

Russia seems to have a handle on it so why can’t the USA do it
Comment from : @invictus2578

Propaganda
Comment from : @Paul-cb8cf

This is disgusting News anchor lady narrating, professional looking men in suits talking the business and costs WSJ doesn't point out that right now all our ICBM's are loaded with only one warhead per, but these new lighter rockets will carry MIRV"s, carrying as many as 5 warheads each No one speaks of how large a city with how many people would die under one of these, the numbers aren't about lives Nuclear warfare has zero conscience or ethics whatsoever Read Nuclear War A Scenario by Annie Jacobsen
Comment from : @mixemyth

Couldnt se spend the money striking a deal to get rid of all nuclear weapons in every country
Comment from : @DouglasNemsky

Nice of them to pinpoint all silo locations, in case the Russians and Chinese missed any 😂 and to point out all associated problems
Comment from : @gregholton6406

Honestly i believe our best bet Is to be designing the minimum missiles With massive upgrades Multiple warheads hypersonic New engines making them faster With some decoys We do this now It will send a message
Comment from : @user-Bornagain

The weapons industry always will at the end!
Comment from : @fingerprint8479

I mean we already blew $800 billion on Ukraine TF?
Comment from : @sniper762x51

Yes, print more money
Comment from : @mrg4847

130 billion is not expensive is we can give 60 billions to Ukraine 😂
Comment from : @ilocanodetoy2225

AI will easily take control of new computer technology
Comment from : @ilocanodetoy2225

Haha there going back to old tex i guess bring the cubes out you nedd 4 legs
Comment from : @joekj6274

Why didnt we keep the MX system going Would have saved $150b
Comment from : @marnav9205

I like how everything is a struggle now But in the 50s-70s everything just worked The greatest generation is missed today
Comment from : @fm-9129

Meanwhile, the russians have made the Satan 2
Comment from : @LividCoffee256

Just be careful, don't outsource to India 🇮🇳
Comment from : @HaadBajwa-q9n

Arguement for upgrading our nukes, Russia and China have upgraded theirs within the past decade
Comment from : @RikkiSan1

I'll
Comment from : @nickragan5168

This estimate was raised to $1409 billion in July 2024 following a Nunn-McCurdy review The Program Acquisition Unit Cost (PAUC) has risen from an estimated $118 million per missile in 2020 to approximately $162 million as of December 2023
Comment from : @LeslieBurke8

Just wait till Gemini gets a hold of these systems😂
Comment from : @analogueoverdigital929

No Chinese chips Heck, just use the same vintage computers, but new :)brbrIf these things have an engineered life of 50 years, I bet they’ll be around for 200 And only test flown Laf, can you imagine if they DID elect to resurrect the old tech and use it, and have floppies 200 years from now?
Comment from : @ronjon7942