| Title | : | The Biggest Myth In Education |
| Lasting | : | 14.27 |
| Date of publication | : | |
| Views | : | 14 jt |
|
|
I have found I learn better with a small group of people Too many people and I start to lose focus But a group of 6, or less! I learnt that last year doing a short course I also learn better at my own pace and hands on I struggle severely with concentration I get distracted by the littlest things! I’ve also found, going to the library and listening to music can help me focus and drown out my surroundings I have always been a slower learner though which sucks I have to be invested in the subject and if there is a teacher, I also learn better if the teacher is excited about what they’re teaching Comment from : @TrekkingWithJess |
|
|
I know this is anecdotal but I never studied, never took notes, never did homework, yet I aced about every test Comment from : @Rayhab92 |
|
|
Don’t lose site of the students’ ability to accept the info Comment from : @paddygoggins2464 |
|
|
Humans learn best when they are being told an immersive story Comment from : @BenjaminMora-r8c |
|
|
"I prefer learning things by doing it myself" Comment from : @barnabas1814 |
|
|
"I prefer to learn about things that I want to learn" - best learning style Comment from : @Saru-f1z |
|
|
You didnt really touch on engagement Its another powerful reason why lectures or talks (IE TED) are sometimes so popular In other words, the learner is either already actively engaged/ interested in the subject at hand, OR the presenter can find ways to make learners engaged (like multi-media) Comment from : @paulthomas3035 |
|
|
I think we need to consider the method of assessment of the content to be able to make a fair conclusion on this matterbrbrLearning styles and assessment methods needs to be considered Comment from : @rickiepretorius |
|
|
My only way to learn is by doing and retaking notes over in a way I can understand, I always had trouble concentrating sadly which made me sad when I wanted to study Luckily medication after a lot of trial and error worked Comment from : @Jeiss_V |
|
|
10:49 speaking factsbr11:47br12:56 This part made me laugh 😆😆br13:34 Comment from : @amy_lialee |
|
|
my learning style is a 1gb ram Comment from : @itsronan2168 |
|
|
I thought i was a visual learner Turns out I'm just stupid Comment from : @oshkoshbegone |
|
|
bread Comment from : @amy_lialee |
|
|
Except jf your blind💀 Comment from : @yea990 |
|
|
I think it’s important that your scientific method be in check You have reached a point of a theory not a conclusion Stating this is fact is not correct There is a lot of evidence this is in fact not correct info I think personally (my opinion) you have some valid info here but to imply people do not learn different regardless of the method frankly lacks common sense Comment from : @GuyCiabattoni |
|
|
I think it’s important that your scientific method be in check You have reached a point if a theory not a conclusion Stating this is fact is not correct There is a lot of evidence this is in fact not correct info I think personally (my opinion) you have some valid info here but to imply people do not learn different regardless of the method frankly lacks common sense Comment from : @GuyCiabattoni |
|
|
2:01 I have that same exact lamp shade in my house Just wanted to share with someone since I can’t share it with my lamp shade Comment from : @leprechaun3677 |
|
|
I learn best when the teacher doesn't talk and lets me learn on my own I hate listening to lectures 😂 Comment from : @michellebovenizer8009 |
|
|
This is memorizing not learning Comment from : @sandraleabenavidesesquivel2275 |
|
|
I would like to see more in Howard Gardner's area of research and how the multiple intelligence theory intersects Comment from : @CreatorUNTITLED |
|
|
I think this may be a flawed test since it depends solely on working/short-term memory, which is not the same as learning nor accounts for people with a deficit in working memory Comment from : @Phizo |
|
|
I went to college for electrical engineering, that and chemistry are often considered the two most difficult subjects since its hard to visualize atoms and electric current and electromagnetic fields easily (beyond a basic circuit, like circuits with inductors and capacitors which makes things even more confusing to visualize, causing the reliance on formulas and math to be significantly more important) While there are graphs and circuits and some video / 3D animation representations, you kind of have no choice but to use every method to be able to fully understand it (Textbooks / text explanation, verbal explanation, graphical / circuit visualization, Labs / hands on, etc) You can't EASILY understand circuits (especially typical / more complex systems and circuits) with only ONE or TWO of these methods, you HAVE to be capable of using every method to understand circuits
br
brCollege didn't even teach me how to do circuit design for whole systems, how to design a circuit from scratch (other than very basic building blocks), or even how to design a PCB, but it taught me how to learn (plus the fundamentals and building blocks) so I can be prepared to figure out HOW to do those things with ease and how to research and understand other peoples work / recognize these building blocks and fundamentals in real world examples
br
br--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
br
brTHE IMPORTANT PART:
br
brCollege gives you the SKILLS / "TOOLS" on HOW to learn and tackle problems using every type of resource Ultimately THAT is the benefit of college
br
br* Engineering is just learning what other people have done, and improving it or combining / expanding things, its ALL just systems made of building blocks to get a certain function or outcome *
br
brHaving the mentality / understanding of HOW to learn in every method has benefitted me greatly in learning things quickly using whatever (sometimes scarce) resources available Information won't always be available in the method you prefer Our brains are capable of using every method, it just takes practice
br
brALSO (VERY BIG ALSO PAY ATTENTION): Sometimes people, graphs, or physical visualizations are just BADLY EXPLAINED OR DESIGNED You aren't always the problem
brThere's just as much skill in TEACHING / EXPLAINING as there is in LEARNING Comment from : @autofigure00 |
|
|
This makes sense brLast semester some master's student was doing tests on us to find our learning style and I felt bad the whole time It felt like they were just too excited to attach some useless label When you learn, you learn When you don't, you try different thing until you learn Comment from : @eienryucho6648 |
|
|
Even with basic maths i take some time I learn them instantly with interacting with stuff Comment from : @nickelisblind |
|
|
So, testing different learning styles withthe same test?? Comment from : @yammerblatt6227 |
|
|
WrongbrI am predominantly a visual learnerbrBut thanks for your concern Comment from : @w0mblemania |
|
|
Funny, your learning expert from UVA said, “If your learning style -was-“ When “was” should have been “were” Not a criticism, just found it funny ;) Comment from : @Flocculation |
|
|
Auditory Comment from : @AL-wn2tt |
|
|
My learning style is , if it interest me I’ll through myself at it in every way possible If I’m not interested, doesn’t matter the style i just don’t engage Comment from : @Level-up-your-life |
|
|
is the experiment showing how much people can remember not affected by the fact that the same list is being shown each time? i feel like reinforcement is negating the actual results of how much people can remember with each "learning style"brbri watched this like a week or two ago, was working on training at work, and had this thought randomly it was itching at my brain and i had to come back to comment Comment from : @hanlore13 |
|
|
The more senses are engaged the better one will understand and thus remember Comment from : @AliAskari-h4o |
|
|
I learn different things from different ways better but application of knowledge immediately and afterwards make Your learning stronger and as teacher I'll employee all the way according to content for teaching when I'll be a teacher Comment from : @neerajprajapati3852 |
|
|
Learning styles were debunked years ago Comment from : @sisuriffs |
|
|
my theory is that it's not necessarily that I can learn better from seeing a diagram than from hearing an explanation - it's that i can focus better when looking at a diagram vs just hearing words of explanation and if i keep my focus better/longer on the subject, of course that means I'll have better chances of actually learning something from that lesson than if I were just sat there with my mind wandering to strange placesbrSo I think it's not so much of a "learning style" but rather an "attention style" I guess Comment from : @verstricktundausgerechnet |
|
|
Pretty good explainer, that does acknowledge that students may have different abilities, but the key is the task, ie you can't learn geography without looking at a map, or music without listening to it and the importance of engagement I'm still not totally convinced on the multi-modal approach for every learning task, sometimes just one mode may be better and I have seen students just watching a video and learning little or nothing Comment from : @markeggins890 |
|
|
I'm on the spectrum for ASD and generally, as a result of this, while using any of the VARK learning styles help me learn better, not very much If I do everything in my head, I feel like I do just as good Dunno why so excited to hear the video out lol Comment from : @remyrauschenberger1603 |
|
|
Whats the alternative? Having every student be dealt with in blocks like an assembly line, not giving some kids the chance to catch up or even try to learn the materialbrSeems to me that at least their trying to br9ng different ways of learning into a classroombrThats not bad in my book Comment from : @videosammy |
|
|
Map of moskovia really Comment from : @denenestorn689 |
|
|
I’ve always thought this thank you! Comment from : @tomroethke |
|
|
I came here to learn something new I'm staying because it sounds like you're the professor in my favorite movie Comment from : @BHRoadStoriesBH |
|
|
I learn easily in number form😅 Comment from : @Priya-wv6pr |
|
|
Learn by experience Comment from : @STOXIU |
|
|
In my experience the difference is the teacher Some people buzz through material as though they know what they are talking about and don’t bother to make it clear to the learner Comment from : @deborahthomas3475 |
|
|
Learning styles are not dichotomic It's like a skill Some methods work best for one and less for the other While some subjects are easier to learn with one style over the other It sounds like they research hypothesis didn't take it into considerationbrFor example, if you teach a ballet dancer a Karate move, she could catch it faster than a geek that all their life avoided Dancing and sports (and didn't develop this learning style ability) Comment from : @jakirgoldner |
|
|
My learning style is: can’t Comment from : @ColocasiaCorm |
|
|
Multi sensory Comment from : @mariekatherine5238 |
|
|
A concept invented by incompetent teachers to be their cover story, blame the student instead of learning from successful teachers Comment from : @shazamshazamshazam696 |
|
|
Clickbait ignorant trash content Comment from : @David-y1x8y |
|
|
My learning style is for sure interactive and adaptive, and in school it was last moment before exams There is no one way Comment from : @the_overflow |
|
|
I learn by smell Comment from : @thekaratekidpartii2169 |
|
|
Speaking as a former elementary school teacher, the more senses involved in the learning process, the more likely the learning occurs Visual, auditory, and tactile are all established methods of enhancing learning When teaching reading, some learn by phonetics (sounding out the letters), but other students will learn to read by visually remembering the word rather than sounding it out This is tru in teaching music as well This is certainly true in teaching spelling because the best trick to teach English spelling is to ask, “Does it look right to you?” Comment from : @harperwelch5147 |
|
|
I am a discuss learnerWhen I discuss a topic with teacher I never fail in focus Comment from : @HossenMohammedSami |
|
|
Interesting however you are not addressing the teachers teaching style What needs to be addressed is the attention span of present day students Comment from : @12snapper43 |
|
|
You seem to confuse data regurgitation with actual learning Comment from : @bwray5054 |
|
|
so how something that is so wrong became so popular? 😅 Comment from : @biancapires8222 |
|
|
Ngl it depends on the subject, for math and English I need visuals, for science and history I need auditory Comment from : @ponguRBLX |
|
|
This video is ridiculous! The “unscientific” method was just that, a test of memory, not learning styles Google should not be sponsoring such content Comment from : @eleewilsonjrcosmosart |
|
|
Despite the video is not new, I really enjoyed it and it inspired me to think about a formal research on this Thanks Comment from : @frankorozco7715 |
|
|
What is absent in all current theory and modes of learning is the actual learner and learner accountability I'm sick of the onus of learning being squarely on the shoulders of the teacher The learner themselves plays a bigger part in the learning process than the teacher That is why the superintendent observed poor teachers reaching students And, we can learn in a variety of ways What we should be focusing on is teaching learners a variety of learning strategies so no matter the material, content, or learning situation they are presented with--they can learn Comment from : @melliott3681 |
|
|
As a teacher, I like to explain stuff and how to work stuff out The students appreciate that, and being given time to work it out Comment from : @jillybe1873 |
|
|
I'm pretty much convinced these ideas were started by parents wanting to give their children a 'nicer' school experience than they had, so schools with nice looking methods and caring for the individual is spoon fed these days for example, In the Netherlands the government only specifies what a child after primary school should have learned and how this is being tested, how the school in question is providing their lessons and what materials they us in entirely up to the school itself brAnd yes, I was extremely surprised of this once I learned about this Anyway, the result is hundreds of different methods and books being available to choose from that replace methods that have been used for decades under the believe they're all better without any reliable proof to underwrite that Comment from : @dan_15mm |
|
|
Communicating information in any format only puts content into short term memory It needs to be thought about and practiced to go into long term memory and create deeper understanding The other factor is engagement with the subject If a student doesn't want to learn or is otherwise not interested in the subject the learning quality won't be that great, regardless of what the instructor does I teach college You can see before class even starts, who is going to learn based on facial expression or body language And for the most part, these are the students who perform well, with some exceptions Comment from : @lpzolob8365 |
|
|
I need three verbals, sight and hands on Comment from : @nataliegist2014 |
|
|
Hands on Comment from : @Deron_mataz |
|
|
Learning style starts in the elementary school age Comment from : @nanc2197 |
|
|
A perfect example of why fad teaching is a bad idea (are you listening, politicians?) "Learning styles" is more about teachers using as many learning modes as possible for different subjects It's not about letting kids think they can't learn if their "style" is not accommodated to their satisfaction Comment from : @StopWhining491 |
|
|
You are ignorant and you piss me off with your frequent ignorance and focused inaccurate episodes You have been polluted by Google culture? Comment from : @septemberamyx |
|
|
My personal theory was that these “styles” correspond with intellect with auditory learners having the highest IQ and hands-on learners having the lowest Comment from : @nultari1 |
|
|
So you tested a non scientific assertion in a non scientific way I'd love to agree with you, but first let me check my horoscope 😂😂😂 Comment from : @bertodsera |
|
|
'm a reader and kinetic learner Comment from : @redbeard5598 |
|
|
my learning style is everything Everything is better than missing the one that helps me the most ig Comment from : @N0_longerr_human |
|
|
I need visual cues to even understand what the conversation is about If someone doesn't show me a visual they may as well not even try to talk to me Comment from : @stevenwhite31415 |
|
|
Shouldn't it be differentiated on actually understanding something, which may be way harder and require both visual, aural, writing and doing, while memorizing isn't really learning and can be be learned with fewer of these "tools" Comment from : @spiff1003 |
|
|
This entire theory is nonsense As I understand it, a well known educator posed the question- are there not perhaps different learning styles? The published article cited anecdotal evidence as to why this question may have value Next thing you know, teachers took it as researched fact… Comment from : @GerhardBothaWFF |
|
|
This famous "science" YouTuber with over 17M subs doesn't understand the difference between memorization and learning? He thinks scientific study is about walking around seeking confirmation bias? Gag Comment from : @ninsuhnrey |
|
|
Yeah learning styles is myth Nearly everyone use all senses Comment from : @michaelmcgee335 |
|
|
Why do you equate learning to memorizing a list of objects that you see or hear for a moment?? I think learning goes deeper, and requires gaining an understanding of complex subjects I think if you want to test learning styles you should test both people's ability to make sense of complexity and retain that information long term using different methods Comment from : @twheys |
|
|
Agreed, everyone employs all of these modes of learning Comment from : @iamstemable2022 |
|
|
Solution: combine everything Comment from : @mumindanmallam |
|
|
Google 😐🙄 Comment from : @treehugger0105 |
|
|
Teaching styles Comment from : @lindalanders3967 |
|
|
1:03 I was like this at school too! Just being attentive, and I would remember a lot of it Comment from : @evelinawe8816 |
|
|
The biggest myth is that teachers teach They don't anymore Comment from : @ArabellaPottery |
|
|
I learn best from doing something and listening at the same time All my drawings, every cross-stitch of a pattern, every stitch of a crochet project is associated in my mind with a piece of knowledge Comment from : @MaryGen-xo6zf |
|
|
I learn really well from reading When I want to learn something, I naturally read about it When I was in lectures (before I became a lecturer myself), I used to treat the lecture the same as a conversation with one person I reasoned that if I had a conversation with a friend and could remember weeks or months or even years later what we talked about (ahh, the memory capacity of youth!), I would just focus on the professor in a lecture as though he was only talking to me, alone in a room, one-on-one I almost never took notes unless it was to write down something like a book title, page number, office hours or other details I needed to be sure about Concepts and information I got and recalled easily for tests Oh, and I got A's - at Berkeley So this works even when the classes are high-level Just focus and actively TAKE an interest, no matter what the topic is That's another trick: TAKE an interest Something that frustrated me as a college teacher was students who would choose to turn off and refuse to learn because 'I'm not interested in this' Well, you weren't interested in a lot of things before you learned something about them TAKE an interest If there are hundreds or thousands of people who can devote their whole lives to becoming an expert on something, it is intrinsically interesting It's boring people who are bored before they even try to learn about something Take an interest in everything and everybody You will never be bored or boring Doesn't matter if it's plumbing or Star Wars or nuclear physics or linguistics: if ANYONE on the planet has ever been interested in it enough to become an expert on it, any other normal human can actively TAKE an interest in it and learn about it Comment from : @FigaroHey |
|
|
Can humanity exist without fashionable theories? Comment from : @Dionelodanote |
|
|
All these are created by educators trying to encourage lazy people to learn There is only one type of learning -- hard working no excusesbrEverything including playing cards and games Comment from : @user23pol |
|
|
I'm an auditory learner Comment from : @abdullahzihad80 |
![]() |
VARK and Other Learning Styles Theories are an Education Myth РѕС‚ : Classable ESL Download Full Episodes | The Most Watched videos of all time |
![]() |
The Biggest Mistakes Boomers Made | Mike Rowe Talks About our Education Crises РѕС‚ : American Virtue Download Full Episodes | The Most Watched videos of all time |
![]() |
The Free Market Myth: An Intro to Keynes versus Friedman РѕС‚ : UNFTR Media Download Full Episodes | The Most Watched videos of all time |
![]() |
Are Learning Styles a Myth? - Veritasium Reaction РѕС‚ : Etacude English Teachers Download Full Episodes | The Most Watched videos of all time |
![]() |
Learning Styles - A Complete Myth РѕС‚ : Memorize Academy Download Full Episodes | The Most Watched videos of all time |
![]() |
Learning Styles Are a Myth! This is How EVERYONE Learns Languages. РѕС‚ : Steve Kaufmann - lingosteve Download Full Episodes | The Most Watched videos of all time |
![]() |
The Myth of Individual Learning Styles, Dr. Robert Bjork РѕС‚ : LastingLearning.com Download Full Episodes | The Most Watched videos of all time |
![]() |
Why learning styles are a complete myth РѕС‚ : Presenting Psychology Download Full Episodes | The Most Watched videos of all time |
![]() |
The Myth of Experience: Kind and Wicked Learning Environments РѕС‚ : iluli by Mike Lamb Download Full Episodes | The Most Watched videos of all time |
![]() |
The Math Myth in Machine Learning... Again and Again РѕС‚ : the data janitor Download Full Episodes | The Most Watched videos of all time |