Chapter 2.4: Michel Foucault, epistemes

Video quality	The size	Download

Information Chapter 2.4: Michel Foucault, epistemes

Title	:	Chapter 2.4: Michel Foucault, epistemes
Lasting	:	11.01
Date of publication	:
Views	:	132 rb

Most histories of the WWII explain it largely in terms of major collective forces rather than merely individual decisions This is totally commonplace The role of unnoticed assumptions in thinking is maybe not quite so tediously banal, but still, not a surprise to any educated person By the way, standing up and gesticulating is less effective than sitting at your desk, and that shirt sucks Nudity would have added momentary interest, but ultimately would distract from your content
Comment from : @dramsaysteele

Excellent! Thank you so much, you really helped me Saludos desde México
Comment from : @danycortes5362

Why do I wear cloths? I'm going to run with THAT one!
Comment from : @RodriguezCarlitos-hd7ti

Is that really how one pronounces episteme? I have been mispronouncing this for years
Comment from : @walterbenjamin1386

This dude has copied The New Episteme by Elly Molina, however, he has presented Foucauldian idea in a comprehensive way
Comment from : @PradipSharma-y8x

This video is outdated Many scientists today interpret scientific experiment results based on progressive liberal morals that they believe ought to be true
Comment from : @checkmate5338

Foucault was an idiot
Comment from : @bobshields6829

Thanks
Comment from : @liyuabebetaye5553

If the unconscious rules get exposed, they're not unconscious anymore, and still have no effect on what is taken seriously by that scientific community
Comment from : @esdet105

Nice explanation!
Comment from : @nancywood5126

Thank you, Lord Jesus, for bringing this informative vdo to us lesser being
Comment from : @vedanshvedansh844

hey there, really enjoyed the video - would love to get these as audio only, are you on audea?
Comment from : @jamaicaigot9335

very good great speaker
Comment from : @louiselaw3184

The first video on YouTube that I have seen with zero dislike! Thanks for sharing your knowledge with the world in such a simple and beautiful explanation Please do a video on dispositif', it will be fascinating to hear your explanation of it
Comment from : @manpreetdhillon8964

The first video on YouTube that I have seen with zero dislike! Thanks for sharing your knowledge with the world in such a simple and beautiful explanation Pls do a vdo on 'dispositif', it will be fascinating to hear your explanation of it
Comment from : @manpreetdhillon8964

Thank you so much!!! I hope that one day I will study in your university
Comment from : @bakyt_yrysov

Damn about that social rule of always being dressed It could've made this lecture from awesome to really lit 🔥
Comment from : @Hannah_Rachel_and_Kotik

That T shirt is everything
Comment from : @Hannah_Rachel_and_Kotik

Yes, thank you for the clarification
Comment from : @yakinimoseley6792

" the episteme of a period is not the sum of its knowledge, nor the general style of its research, but the divergence, the distances, the oppositions and differences the relations of its various scientific discourses: the episteme is not a sort of grand underlying theory, it is a space of dispersion"brbrCan u pls xplain what xatly is meant by 'not a sort of grand underlying theory'??? & 'space of dispersion' all about???? Can it be called as ideology???
Comment from : @lalsurya2275

It’s perfect that he covered the unconscious because a mob of unconscious Marxist’s are running the country now …
Comment from : @lalaboards

I object mentioning Freud amongst this list of the geatest men, I object mentioning his name at all when the wod science is mentioned, generally speaking
Comment from : @Magdoulin

In short, after what we couldn't achieve with the proletarian war, we will achieve with the cultural war, at least we won't have the skin of our belly glued to our backsbrA new outfit, the same body Marxism
Comment from : @arturmontalvao4133

Good lecture Thanks
Comment from : @HN-ls6rd

Philosophers: racism is caused by Science (blame Darwin)brScience: skin doesn't have any colorbrBLM: are you saying that we do not exist????brScience: no, it's just that NOTHING has color in first placebrPhilosophers: ok, color is not even in your mind, but ''just a subjective perception''brAlso philosophers: you can create things with wordsbrScience: NO That's magical thinking and irrational and leads to violence & warsbrPhilosophers: Reality is not even made of matter, but our subjective perception, hence, we can create realitybrReligions: (yessssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss)
Comment from : @VeronicaGorositoMusic

This sounds a lot like the "they" in Being and Time
Comment from : @michaeldao1

Going from a cultural leap to shirts, and comparing that to science Believing that unconscious rules effect science in the same way shirt wearing it a huge illogical leap It's a human assumption to believe that It used to be considered "science" to understand that gravity was "something going to it's natural place", Foucault's assumption about science isn't an apples to apples comparison it's like humans do their natural things The way you treat a child isn't the same as you treat an adult, it isn't the same as how you would research for fact using science Foucault doesn't believe that humans are creative and they are limited to their culture, that's the core of his point, and that throughout history has been proven wrong repeatedly through science
Comment from : @AstroSquid

So that's why lefties don't seem to have any wisdom Throw it all out
Comment from : @NathansHVAC

Thanks Jesus
Comment from : @AK-mt6id

Deze gast is zo goed!
Comment from : @Xargxes

The bestiary example clarified the work of the episteme in a way that has been hard to find online Thanks a lot <3
Comment from : @ambiguism

the drawing on his t shirt is literally horrible
Comment from : @liyexiang666

Thank you SO much I'm trying to write my final essay on Foucalt but I can't make sense of my lecturers interpretation You're saving me here!
Comment from : @jennyboanca473

the Depopulation Agenda is the episteme that explains the viciousness of science these days: wuhan lab, CRISPR, weather modification, nanochips for rfid vaccines the gorbachev foundation meeting in san francisco’s presidio in 1996, this was the kickoff of the new episteme: science and media and politics (in a word, “bureaucracy”) must depopulate the globe, for the sake of Global Finance Anthony Fauci - who funded the EVIL project through NIH grants -needs to be ARRESTED for creating offensive bioweapons which are ILLEGAL under international law China got UNC to do bioweapons research which was funded by the NIH — to kill us all
Comment from : @SK-le1gm

WowbrWonderful explanation brI really want to attend his class
Comment from : @ssaa32000

So America is seeing a paradigm shift in politics right now
Comment from : @fakedonttrackmevro6629

It's like a paradigm is a frontend development, and episteme is a backend Awesome content, I actually subscribed :)
Comment from : @choccomonde

foucault had a powerful mind but wasted it sadly his thinking is too circular and lazy his principles are now being bastardized to destroy basic cause and effect priciples and the very foundation of questioning theories Its sad As though the scientific theory or idea has anything to do with the color of someones skin or the place from which the idea came give me a break The idea is either good and works or is flawed and doesn't work Has nothing to do with the person who comes up with the idea The dangers of weak thought
Comment from : @nathanhuber5333

Erg duidelijk Go on dear son!!
Comment from : @paulvholten2649

abdelkaderziouche28@gmailcom
Comment from : @AbdelkaderZiouchezal

Relevant to the corona virus as SAGE is behaving like a Masonic cabbalistic committeemaking decisions about our most intimate life livelihoods and living without the public being informed accordinglyDemocracy?My footWho is Dominic Cumming?Who voted for him?Food for ThoughtsThis is the Epistemic whirlpool the phantasmaria the zygeist of the epoques
Comment from : @abooswalehmosafeer173

My friend, you are a legend Thanks a lot!
Comment from : @asd9508

So could an episteme be described as an Overton window for paradigms?
Comment from : @thomasboguszewski7288

Great explanation U make it easier, Thanks
Comment from : @annapurna6344

One of the clearest explanations of 'episteme' I have come across - with relevant examples
Comment from : @lesleymartin7552

I benefited a lot from your presentation Thank you so much!
Comment from : @radwael-bassossi7471

Paradigm is not understood as its first and main base as spatial, common understanding even without words and by so this explanation fails badly I'm not fan of Kühn, but even less Foucault Cultureantrophology or history of science are not answers the questions philosophy
Comment from : @juhamiettinen9517

Major achievement to break down such a big theory into these well comprehensible chunks Thanks a lot for that! the unconsiuos reminds me of Habermas' "Vorwissenschaftlichen Erfahrungen" (pre-scientific experiences)
Comment from : @rodsnyder6020

Thank you! The best explanation of the episteme that I have encountered!
Comment from : @francesoconnor6896

outstanding presentations! Congratulations and respect
Comment from : @leocaballerorojo2348

Is this a Dutch accent?
Comment from : @Ephebiphobe

About the only relevant social theory anyone in humanities studies Rest is all trash lol
Comment from : @ReTr093

Well done
Comment from : @a5dr3

❤️❤️❤️❤️
Comment from : @ivanabenassai6162

You’re great, but I would love to ask why you’re referring to knowledge as science; for the former is an umbrella term, while the latter much more surgical!brJust wanted to know your views
Comment from : @agnivaray7476

fantastic video with ten minutes i can read a book and get new idea the presenter excellent
Comment from : @mihadhusain7067

AND what are these 3 ONLY epistemes in the last 500 years????
Comment from : @coronatempo721

Fantastic series, great explanations and examples Congratulations
Comment from : @ulibaer5805

5:49 someone grin at him while he says 'completely naked' lol
Comment from : @drajatdiky

Excellent piece! Foucault's caution against Western focus on individualist methodologies is actually in accordance with the primordial role that many cultures, notably African societies, assign to the dynamics of interdependency For instance, a keen student of Bantu philosophy can seldom take seriously Des Cartes' idea: "Je pense, donc je suis [I think, so I am" For, in Bantu world, being is belonging Bishop Desmond Tutu has articulated very well this reality, arguing: " I am because I belong, I participate, I share" This is the kind of episteme worth taking seriously
Comment from : @noelt1013

thank you so much for this video I love u <3
Comment from : @ArrunganzPrincess

What's the name of this Man?brHe done wonder on interpretation of Focualt!! Thanks
Comment from : @shivnarayan1651

This video was very helpful for my research project, thank you so much for this amazing video
Comment from : @carlosmanuelsanturtunbecer4174

Muchas gracias!
Comment from : @gaviota508

So modern epistemes would be IQ and race?
Comment from : @dollydrill5816

Thanks very helpful, could you please name what are those three epestemes according to Foucault? Thanks
Comment from : @suddafbutt7119

but a change of episteme cant be just around the corner because they are defined retrospectively, right?
Comment from : @rogersyversen3633

thank you!
Comment from : @thereover5438

As a linguist, I really want to commend you for using female pronouns instead of male pronouns when talking about a random scientist/historian/person Gender equality for the win!
Comment from : @RineGal

It seems like his ideas are a synthesis of Marxism and Freud's ideas on the unconscious
Comment from : @dimik2240

:) Good video
Comment from : @adele3368

You should check your terminology Foucault would no agree with your approach in many instances For example, episteme is not the underground assumptions It is the rules of formation of discourse It is quite different from Kuhn's scientific paradigms
Comment from : @flourishforever