Learning Design vs Instructional Design: There is a BIG difference

Video quality	The size	Download

Information Learning Design vs Instructional Design: There is a BIG difference

Title	:	Learning Design vs Instructional Design: There is a BIG difference
Lasting	:	4.17
Date of publication	:
Views	:	20 rb

The music is distracting
Comment from : @mshopey32

I think I concentrated more on your music brI was dancing and couldn’t concentrate brI didn’t learn anything 😢
Comment from : @sandradiaz2202

Thank you very informative 👍 ❤
Comment from : @Anikvikram

I find learning design as a jargon used by the people in the academe On the other hand, instructional design sounds corporate or industrial
Comment from : @AlphieG

Great video! You are exactly right LEARNING should be engaging, exploratory and even fun! I chuckle when I hear others pull out all the technical jargon and definitions I really appreciate folks like you making a distinction and pushing for LEARNING as the target goal I have seen miles and miles of "instruction" Real learning is what makes me think of my most inspiring teachers Thank you for your inspirations!!
Comment from : @1yeahbaby

I appreciate the content of your videos but please, could you avoid using this type of background music? it's quite distracting, :( I have a hard time to get through the video because of this music Thanks in advance
Comment from : @MAFEARIAS

Your tone is exactly the sameEvery second of this video you need to work out that
Comment from : @ANGOLARICK

This is even more problematic in Spanish speaking countries brbrHere instruction is not equivalent to teaching Safe for very technical training brbrOh dear I support the learning designer concept and might even go further: Education designer brbrFor it is as necessary to design the teaching or instruction
Comment from : @MauricioArrieta

Perhaps instructional design focuses on the learning bit not so much on the experiences surrounding and driving it
Comment from : @Pritha879

I realize that I am responding late to this thread, but I personally believe that Instructional Design is the more appropriate term Learning is a process, a journey the student embarks on, in their quest for new knowledge On the other hand, instruction is presumed to be in the correct processes and thereby taking away the right learning outcomes Oftentimes, students "learn" incomplete or flat-out erroneous information Hence, the need for a subject matter expert's input and evaluation of what the student should have learned as compared to what the student actually learned In the end, I believe it is mostly a matter of semantics but if I were forced to choose the more appropriate term, its Instructional Design
Comment from : @lc3507

I would Instructional Designer because I don’t always develop traditional learning/training for process or system changes, as it may simply be a set of other resources, such work instructions, qrgs or procedural guides provided to end users I would also think there is sometimes a need for an Instructional Designers and sometimes a Learning Experience Designer or for some projects both skills could apply
Comment from : @MichAndo2712

Yes , I agree with you Thank you very much for sharing with us it is very useful for us teaching TVET training
Comment from : @TMLevel1

To me, instructional design is more appropriate, we should note that learning is the desired response, instruction entails setting-up of stimuli that can trigger desire response while teaching is the implementation of instruction Instruction in education context is not only entail verbal command, it encompasses all stimuli put in place for learning to take place Technology only takeaway/modify the role of teachers (content delivery) it does not take away the role of instructional design Thank you
Comment from : @kabiruadisasoretire2635

The learner doesn't care if the learning was designed by an instructional designer or a learning designer, so it's just semantics in the end
Comment from : @petertwyman5250

This is just opinion right? Learning also makes it less specific which means you don't have to show effectiveness or measure specifically Keep it ambiguous and you can keep making it pretty
Comment from : @alexdavidsalas

What are the different types of learning design?please answer 🙏🙏
Comment from : @supprriyooo

You can't really design learning (or 'what is learnt') You can design the experience (or 'opportunity') within which people learn So I'm going with LXDbrbrMaybe you can do something on why we should lose the 'D' in 'L&D'
Comment from : @mpandlane

i think Learning Experiences design is the best title for the instructional designer to migrate to new LXD
Comment from : @PacoTabares

This is an excellent perspective!
Comment from : @deandra19pbp

I don't think there are two roles - just a change in name Nor do I think learners will be aware of the difference There's also value in videoing a lecture and putting notes up - eg for people who can't attend For me, it's always been horses for courses - what's the best available medium for the task BTW I don't think you can actually design learning unless you change the meaning of learning - see here youtube/qir0vQJquDs
Comment from : @whatyouneedtoknow